Response to invited commentary: “Event-based versus process-based informed consent to address scientific evidence and uncertainties in ionizing medical imaging” by Recchia et al
Neuroradiology
Interventional radiology
DOI:
10.1007/s13244-013-0284-2
Publication Date:
2013-09-09T03:28:33Z
AUTHORS (3)
ABSTRACT
We thank Prof. Vock for his noteworthy and constructive commentary [1]. This gives us the opportunity to briefly provide additional observations elaborate this topic further. agree with that our theoretical approach [2] may not be applied in a non-invasive low-dose medical imaging. Nevertheless, makes innovation we are trying develop even more challenging. all discussing about something similar “paradigm shift”, sense described by Kuhn [3]: (a) presenting results “sufficiently unprecedented attract an enduring group of adherents away from competing modes scientific activity” (b) “being sufficiently open-ended leave sorts problems redefined practitioners solve.”
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (6)
CITATIONS (0)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....