Discrepancies Between Physician-Perceived and Calculated Cardiovascular Risk in Primary Prevention: Implications for LDL-C Target Achievement and Appropriate Lipid-Lowering Therapy
Primary Prevention
Primary (astronomy)
DOI:
10.1007/s40292-025-00705-0
Publication Date:
2025-02-19T05:15:11Z
AUTHORS (17)
ABSTRACT
Accurate risk assessment is critical in cardiovascular (CV) prevention, yet physicians often underestimate CV risk, leading to inadequate preventive measures. This study evaluates the concordance between physician-perceived and calculated a primary prevention setting. cross-sectional included patients from Cardiology Outpatient Clinic of Caserta Hospital, Italy. Two independent cardiologists evaluated third resolved discrepancies. was using SCORE2 for with 70 years or less SCORE2-OP those more than years. The perceived risks assessed Cohen's kappa coefficient. Multivariate logistic regression analysis performed examine influence estimation on achieving low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) targets recommended by ESC. 389 had complete data calculation. Physician-perceived categorized 8.7% as low/moderate, 37.8% high, 53.5% very-high risk. In contrast, according SCORE2/SCORE2-OP classified 8% 5.7% 86.4% poor (Cohen's 0.208, p < 0.001). Underestimated reached LDL-C 16% cases, well-estimated 34.5%, overestimated 76.9%. Statin use significantly lower underestimated (29.2%) compared (50%) (76.9%) groups (p showed that were likely achieve (OR 5.33, CI 1.33–21.42, = 0.018), whereas 47% 0.53, 0.3–0.93, 0.027). A significant discrepancy exists underestimation over one-third patients. associated target achievement reduced statin use.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (22)
CITATIONS (1)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....