The Perimount Valve in the Aortic Position: Twenty-Year Experience With Patients Under 60 Years Old
Adult
Bioprosthesis
Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
Male
Reoperation
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Adolescent
Age Factors
Heart Valve Diseases
Middle Aged
Prognosis
Echocardiography, Doppler
Prosthesis Failure
3. Good health
Cohort Studies
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Aortic Valve
Cause of Death
Heart Valve Prosthesis
Humans
Female
Hospital Mortality
DOI:
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.02.019
Publication Date:
2014-03-28T16:19:02Z
AUTHORS (10)
ABSTRACT
With improved durability of contemporary bioprostheses, surgeons are now recommending biologic valves in younger patients. However, long-term outcomes of patients younger than 60 years old undergoing biologic aortic valve implantation are not well known.From November 1991 to March 2011, 144 patients less than 60 years old underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) with Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valves (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA). Mean follow-up was 10±4 years. Outcomes were reported according to published guidelines.Seventy-five percent of patients were male, with a mean age of 51±9 years. Actuarial survival rates including early deaths were 89%±3%, 79%±4%, and 57%±6% after 5, 10, and 15 years of follow-up, respectively. Survival of patients was comparatively lower than a gender- and age-matched general population at all time points. The freedom from major adverse cardiac events (myocardial infarction, heart failure, hemorrhage, thromboembolic event, and endocarditis) was 89%±3%, 87%±3%, and 75%±6% at 5, 10, and 15 years after surgery. The freedom rate from prosthetic valve dysfunction was 97%±2%, 84%±4%, and 57%±6% at 5, 10, and 15 years after surgery. Patients with a diagnosis of structural valve deterioration (29 of 37, 78%) underwent reoperation 11±5 years after the initial valve replacement with no perioperative mortality.In patients younger than 60 years undergoing AVR, the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount bioprosthesis provided satisfactory clinical outcomes. However, late survival was inferior to an age- and gender-matched population. Structural valve deterioration and the need for reintervention were common late after implantation, but reoperation for prosthetic valve dysfunction was associated with a very low risk of mortality.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (30)
CITATIONS (71)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....