Simultaneous rTMS and psychotherapy in major depressive disorder: Clinical outcomes and predictors from a large naturalistic study
Adult
Male
TRANSCRANIAL MAGNETIC STIMULATION
STAR-ASTERISK-D
DORSOLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX
Biophysics
Clinical Neurology
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation/methods
DOUBLE-BLIND
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
Journal Article
Humans
repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)
Treatment outcome
COGNITIVE-BEHAVIORAL THERAPY
METAANALYSIS
Clinical predictors
Major depressive disorder (MDD)
SHAM-CONTROLLED TRIALS
Depressive Disorder
Depressive Disorder, Major
General Neuroscience
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL
Major/therapy
Middle Aged
EFFICACY
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
3. Good health
Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy/methods
TREATMENT-RESISTANT DEPRESSION
Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)
Female
DOI:
10.1016/j.brs.2017.11.004
Publication Date:
2017-11-11T04:16:28Z
AUTHORS (5)
ABSTRACT
Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is considered an efficacious non-invasive neuromodulation treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). However, little known about the clinical outcome of combined rTMS and psychotherapy (rTMS + PT). Through common neurobiological brain mechanisms, PT may exert enhanced antidepressant effects compared to respective monotherapies.The current naturalistic study aimed evaluate feasibility in a large group MDD patients. The second aim was identify predictors response remission.A total 196 patients with were treated at least 10 sessions simultaneous PT. applied over DLPFC, either Hz left or 1 right. Psychotherapy based on principles cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Symptoms measured using BDI each fifth session until end 6-month follow-up. Comparisons made between responders non-responders, as well protocol. Additionally, baseline variables early change evaluated response/remission.1) Combining resulted 66% 56% remission rate 60% sustained Compared previous findings RCTs, these rates are relatively high; 2) No differences found TMS regarding outcome; 3) Clinical not predictive outcomes; 4) Early symptom improvement (at 10) highly response, therefore be used guide continuation; 5) Based study, future studies employing more standardized method warranted draw solid conclusions unique effect
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (55)
CITATIONS (125)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....