Experimental and numerical investigation into effect of different blade configurations on performance of small-scale wind turbines
Renewable energy
Scale (ratio)
Marine engineering
FOS: Mechanical engineering
02 engineering and technology
Computational fluid dynamics
7. Clean energy
Wind speed
Engineering
Range (aeronautics)
0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering
Rotor (electric)
Physics
Urban Wind Environment and Air Quality Modeling
Computer simulation
Mechanical engineering
Aerospace engineering
CFD Simulations
Physical Sciences
Electrical engineering. Electronics. Nuclear engineering
Wind Energy Technology and Aerodynamics
CFD
Wind tunnel
Simulation
Turbine
Numerical analysis
Environmental Engineering
Turbine blade
Aerospace Engineering
Structural engineering
Mechanics
Mathematical analysis
Quantum mechanics
Meteorology
Blade (archaeology)
FOS: Mathematics
Untwisted blades
NACA0012 and NACA4418
FOS: Environmental engineering
Large-Eddy Simulation
Twisted blades
HAWT
TK1-9971
Turbulence
Wind Farm Optimization
Electrical engineering
Environmental Science
Wind power
Mathematics
DOI:
10.1016/j.egyr.2021.06.025
Publication Date:
2021-09-27T21:02:27Z
AUTHORS (3)
ABSTRACT
Experimental investigations and numerical analysis using Ansys CFD software of the effect different blade configurations on performance small-scale wind turbines are presented in this paper. A complete test rig turbine is built, three-dimensional computational model rotor system created simulated Realizable K−ε turbulent to evaluate four types (Twisted blades with NACA0012, Straight (untwisted) Twisted NACA4418, NACA4418). The experimental has been carried out at various speeds range 2 m/s 8 study variation power coefficient for speed choose most effective design blades. results show that solution over predicts produced compared field all tested configurations. maximum deviation was around 15 percent between decreased increasing speed. Untwisted NACA0012 suitable small scale based results, giving an average actual (Cp = 0.41). Compared configuration, simple manufacturing minimum cost.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (9)
CITATIONS (7)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....