Prediction of bone strength by μCT and MDCT-based finite-element-models: How much spatial resolution is needed?

• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2013.10.024
• Publication Date: 2013-11-08T03:45:21Z
• Authors: Jan S. Bauer; Irina Sidorenko; Dirk Mueller; Thomas Baum; Ahi Sema Issever; Felix Eckstein; Ernst J. Rummeny; Thomas M. Link; Christoph W. Raeth
• Keywords: Male; Compressive Strength; data analysis; Finite Element Analysis; 0206 medical engineering; 02 engineering and technology; Models, Biological; Sensitivity and Specificity; Thoracic Vertebrae; Absorptiometry, Photon; Bone Density; Elastic Modulus; Tensile Strength; Multidetector Computed Tomography; Humans; Computer Simulation; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; FEM; Reproducibility of Results; Bone structure; Radiographic Image Enhancement; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; Female; Stress, Mechanical

Finite-element-models (FEM) are a promising technology to predict bone strength and fracture risk. Usually, the highest spatial resolution technically available is used, but this requires excessive computation time and memory in numerical simulations of large volumes. Thus, FEM were compared at decreasing resolutions with respect to local strain distribution and prediction of failure load to (1) validate MDCT-based FEM and to (2) optimize spatial resolution to save computation time.20 cylindrical trabecular bone specimens (diameter 12 mm, length 15-20mm) were harvested from elderly formalin-fixed human thoracic spines. All specimens were examined by micro-CT (isotropic resolution 30 μm) and whole-body multi-row-detector computed tomography (MDCT, 250 μm × 250 μm × 500 μm). The resolution of all datasets was lowered in eight steps to ~ 2,000 μm × 2000 μm × 500 μm and FEM were calculated at all resolutions. Failure load was determined by biomechanical testing. Probability density functions of local micro-strains were compared in all datasets and correlations between FEM-based and biomechanically measured failure loads were determined.The distribution of local micro-strains was similar for micro-CT and MDCT at comparable resolutions and showed a shift toward higher average values with decreasing resolution, corresponding to the increasing apparent trabecular thickness. Small micro-strains (εeff<0.005) could be calculated down to 250 μm × 250 μm × 500 μm. Biomechanically determined failure load showed significant correlations with all FEM, up to r=0.85 and did not significantly change with lower resolution but decreased with high thresholds, due to loss of trabecular connectivity.When choosing connectivity-preserving thresholds, both micro-CT- and MDCT-based finite-element-models well predicted failure load and still accurately revealed the distribution of local micro-strains in spatial resolutions, available in vivo (250 μm × 250 μm × 500 μm), that thus seemed to be the optimal compromise between high accuracy and low computation time.