Accuracy of iodine quantification in dual-layer spectral CT: Influence of iterative reconstruction, patient habitus and tube parameters
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Phantoms, Imaging
Abdomen
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
Humans
Reproducibility of Results
Radiation Dosage
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Algorithms
Iodine
DOI:
10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.03.009
Publication Date:
2018-03-08T13:31:02Z
AUTHORS (10)
ABSTRACT
Evaluation of the influence of iterative reconstruction, tube settings and patient habitus on the accuracy of iodine quantification with dual-layer spectral CT (DL-CT).A CT abdomen phantom with different extension rings and four iodine inserts (1, 2, 5 and 10 mg/ml) was scanned on a DL-CT. The phantom was scanned with tube-voltages of 120 and 140 kVp and CTDIvol of 2.5, 5, 10 and 20 mGy. Reconstructions were performed for eight levels of iterative reconstruction (i0-i7). Diagnostic dose levels are classified depending on patient-size and radiation dose.Measurements of iodine concentration showed accurate and reliable results. Taking all CTDIvol-levels into account, the mean absolute percentage difference (MAPD) showed less accuracy for low CTDIvol-levels (2.5 mGy: 34.72%) than for high CTDIvol-levels (20 mGy: 5.89%). At diagnostic dose levels, accurate quantification of iodine was possible (MAPD 3.38%). Level of iterative reconstruction did not significantly influence iodine measurements. Iodine quantification worked more accurately at a tube voltage of 140 kVp. Phantom size had a considerable effect only at low-dose-levels; at diagnostic dose levels the effect of phantom size decreased (MAPD <5% for all phantom sizes).With DL-CT, even low iodine concentrations can be accurately quantified. Accuracies are higher when diagnostic radiation doses are employed.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (29)
CITATIONS (55)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....