Prognostic significance of Ki67 index after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer

• DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2010.10.009
• Publication Date: 2010-12-16T09:43:52Z
• Authors: T. Tanei; A. Shimomura; K. Shimazu; T. Nakayama; S.J. Kim; T. Iwamoto; Y. Tamaki; S. Noguchi
• Keywords: Adult; Genetic Markers; Breast Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Disease-Free Survival; Neoadjuvant Therapy; 3. Good health; 03 medical and health sciences; Ki-67 Antigen; 0302 clinical medicine; Humans; Female

Recently, Ki67 index (cell proliferation marker) has been attracting a considerable attention as a prognostic factor in breast cancer but the prognostic significance of Ki67 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has rarely been examined.Primary breast cancer patients (n = 102) treated with NAC (sequential paclitaxel 12 cycles (q1w) and 5-FU/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide 4 cycles (q3w)) were recruited in the study. Ki67, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) and breast cancer resistant protein (BCRP) and P-glycoprotein were determined by immunohistochemistry and HER2 was determined by FISH in tumor tissues obtained before and after NAC, and their association with patient prognosis (relapse-free survival) was examined.Of the 102 patients, pCR was achieved in 30 (29.4%). In the 72 non-pCR patients, Ki67 index significantly (P < 0.001) decreased after NAC. Ki67 index after NAC, but not Ki67 index before NAC, was significantly associated with a patient prognosis (P = 0.022). Multivariate analysis has shown that Ki67 index after NAC is a marginally significant (P = 0.05) prognostic factor and that other biomarkers including ER, PR, BCRP, and P-glycoprotein before and after NAC are not significant.Ki67 after NAC, but not before NAC, is prognostic in breast cancer patients, and might be clinically useful in the prognosis prediction of patients who do not achieve pCR after NAC. On the other hand, BCRP and P-glycoprotein before and after NAC are unlikely to be useful as prognostic factors in these patients.