The chaos in calibrating crop models: Lessons learned from a multi-model calibration exercise

ANZSRC::300207 Agricultural systems analysis and modelling 0208 environmental biotechnology 610 Process-based models 02 engineering and technology phenology ANZSRC::461207 Software quality Parameter estimation ANZSRC::419999 Other environmental sciences not elsewhere classified ta113 processes and metrics calibration recommendations Calibration recommendations 600 Calibration recommendations; Parameter estimation; Phenology; Process-based models ta4111 ANZSRC::401102 Environmentally sustainable engineering process-based models [STAT]Statistics [stat] Phenology Calibration Recommendations ; Process-based Models ; Parameter Estimation ; Phenology [SDE]Environmental Sciences parameter estimation info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/004
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105206 Publication Date: 2021-09-20T10:21:09Z
ABSTRACT
Calibration, the estimation of model parameters based on fitting the model to experimental data, is among the first steps in many applications of process-based models and has an important impact on simulated values. We propose a novel method of developing guidelines for calibration of process-based models, based on development of recommendations for calibration of the phenology component of crop models. The approach was based on a multi-model study, where all teams were provided with the same data and asked to return simulations for the same conditions. All teams were asked to document in detail their calibration approach, including choices with respect to criteria for best parameters, choice of parameters to estimate and software. Based on an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of the various choices, we propose calibration recommendations that cover a comprehensive list of decisions and that are based on actual practices.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (60)
CITATIONS (58)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....