Examining holistic developmental strengths and needs of multilingual kindergartners using the Early Development Instrument

• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100315
• Publication Date: 2023-12-15T16:58:48Z
• Authors: Judith L. Perrigo; Lisa Stanley; L.Sarah Mixson; Leila Espinosa; Jordan Morales; Chandler Beck; Neal Halfon
• Keywords: National Neighborhood Equity Index (NNEI); Kindergartners; 05 social sciences; Prevention and Early Intervention (PEI); English learners; 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences; Theory and practice of education; Asset-based framework; Early Development Instrument (EDI); LB5-3640

Using an asset-based framework, this study examines the holistic developmental health outcomes of young English Learners (ELs) in the United States using the Early Development Instrument (EDI), stratified by first language and neighborhood risk measured by the National Neighborhood Equity Index (NNEI). Drawing from data spanning 154 school districts across 11 states and the District of Columbia from 2016 to 2020 (n = 192,892 kindergartners), the analyses encompassed descriptive statistics, Pearson Chi-square tests, and logistic regression models. The results highlight that EL kindergartners were more likely to be On Track in the social competence (OR = 1.17; 95 % CI = 1.13, 1.20), emotional maturity (OR = 1.26; 95 % CI = 1.22, 1.30), and physical health and well-being (OR = 1.47; 95 % CI = 1.43,1.51) domains compared to non-EL kindergartners. Yet, in the communication skills and general knowledge (OR = 0.75; CI = 0.72, 0.77) and language and cognitive development (OR = 0.72; CI = 0.70, 0.74) domains, EL kindergartners were less likely to be On Track compared to non-EL kindergartners. Notably, Korean- and Mandarin-speaking kindergartners showed the highest rates of being On Track across all EDI domains. Additionally, EL kindergartners in less challenged neighborhoods were surprisingly less likely to be On Track compared to those in more adverse neighborhoods across all developmental domains. Implications of these findings, which shed light on distinctive strengths and needs, are discussed.