Modifiable Mechanical Ventilation Targets Are Associated With Improved Survival in Ventilated VA-ECLS Patients

• DOI: 10.1016/j.jchf.2023.03.023
• Publication Date: 2023-05-10T18:38:39Z
• Authors: Aniket S. Rali; Lena E. Tran; Bryan Auvil; Meng Xu; Shi Huang; Lyana Labrada; Kelly H. Schlendorf; Matthew D. Bacchetta; Ashish S. Shah; Antonio Hernandez; JoAnn Lindenfeld
• Keywords: Original Research Paper; Heart Failure; Positive-Pressure Respiration; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Humans; Respiration, Artificial; Lung; 3. Good health; Retrospective Studies

In acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), lung protective ventilation (LPV) improves patient outcomes by minimizing ventilator-induced lung injury. The value of LPV in ventilated patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) requiring venoarterial extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS) is not known, but the extracorporeal circuit provides a unique opportunity to modify ventilatory parameters to improve outcomes.The authors hypothesized that CS patients on VA-ECLS who require mechanical ventilation (MV) may benefit from low intrapulmonary pressure ventilation (LPPV), which has the same end goals as LPV.The authors queried the ELSO (Extracorporeal Life Support Organization) registry for hospital admissions between 2009 and 2019 for CS patients on VA-ECLS and MV. They defined LPPV as peak inspiratory pressure at 24 hours on ECLS of <30 cm H2O. Positive end-expiration pressure and dynamic driving pressure (DDP) at 24 hours were also studied as continuous variables. Their primary outcome was survival to discharge. Multivariable analyses were performed that adjusted for baseline Survival After Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation score, chronic lung conditions, and center extracorporeal membrane oxygenation volume.A total of 2,226 CS patients on VA-ECLS were included: 1,904 received LPPV. The primary outcome was higher in the LPPV group vs the no-LPPV group (47.4% vs 32.6%; P < 0.001). Median peak inspiratory pressure (22 vs 24 cm H2O; P < 0.001) as well as DDP (14.5 vs 16 cm H2O; P < 0.001) were also significantly lower in those surviving to discharge. The adjusted OR for the primary outcome with LPPV was 1.69 (95% CI: 1.21-2.37; P = 0.0021).LPPV is associated with improved outcomes in CS patients on VA-ECLS requiring MV.