Indicators of questionable research practices were identified in 163,129 randomized controlled trials

• DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.11.020
• Publication Date: 2022-12-02T08:38:25Z
• Authors: Johanna A. Damen; Pauline Heus; Herm J. Lamberink; Joeri K. Tijdink; Lex Bouter; Paul Glasziou; David Moher; Willem M. Otte; Christiaan H. Vin...; Lotty Hooft
• Keywords: Blinding; Proxy (statistics); Impact factor

To explore indicators of the following questionable research practices (QRPs) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs): (1) risk of bias in four domains (random sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding of participants and personnel, and blinding of outcome assessment); (2) modifications in primary outcomes that were registered in trial registration records (proxy for selective reporting bias); (3) ratio of the achieved to planned sample sizes; and (4) statistical discrepancy.Full texts of all human RCTs published in PubMed in 1996-2017 were automatically identified and information was collected automatically. Potential indicators of QRPs included author-specific, publication-specific, and journal-specific characteristics. Beta, logistic, and linear regression models were used to identify associations between these potential indicators and QRPs.We included 163,129 RCT publications. The median probability of bias assessed using Robot Reviewer software ranged between 43% and 63% for the four risk of bias domains. A more recent publication year, trial registration, mentioning of CONsolidated Standards Of Reporting Trials-checklist, and a higher journal impact factor were consistently associated with a lower risk of QRPs.This comprehensive analysis provides an insight into indicators of QRPs. Researchers should be aware that certain characteristics of the author team and publication are associated with a higher risk of QRPs.