Does Warm-Up Training in a Virtual Reality Simulator Improve Surgical Performance? A Prospective Randomized Analysis

• DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.04.020
• Publication Date: 2016-05-25T01:58:39Z
• Authors: José Arnaldo Shio...; Sabrina Thalita d...; Rodrigo Marcus Cu...; Ricardo Jordão Du...; Hiep Nguyen; Miguel Srougi; Carlo Camargo Pas...
• Keywords: Adult; Male; Students, Medical; Swine; Operative Time; Blood Loss, Surgical; Quality Improvement; User-Computer Interface; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; Reference Values; Preoperative Period; Animals; Humans; Female; Laparoscopy; Prospective Studies; Exercise; Simulation Training; Education, Medical, Undergraduate

Virtual reality surgical simulators (VRSS) have been showing themselves as a valuable tool in laparoscopy training and education. Taking in consideration the effectiveness of the VRSS, new uses for this tool have been purposed. In sports, warming up before exercise clearly shows benefit in performance. It is hypothesized that warming up in the VRSS before going to the operating room may show benefit in surgical performance.Verify whether there is benefit in surgical performance with preoperatory warm-up using a VRSS.A total of 20 medical students with basic knowledge in laparoscopy were divided in 2 groups (I and II). Group I performed a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a porcine model. Group II performed preoperative warm-up in a VRSS and then performed a laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a porcine model. The performance between both groups was compared regarding quantitative parameters (time for dissection of the gallbladder pedicle, time for clipping the pedicle, time for cutting the pedicle, time for gallbladder removal, total operative time, and aspirated blood loss) and qualitative parameters (depth perception, bimanual dexterity, efficiency, tissue handling, and autonomy) based on a previously validated score system, in which the higher the score, the better the result. Data were analyzed with level of significance of 5%.The group that underwent preoperative warm-up (group II) showed significantly superior results as to the time for dissection of the gallbladder pedicle (11.91 ± 9.85 vs. 4.52 ± 2.89min, p = 0.012), time for clipping the pedicle (5.51 ± 2.36 vs. 2.89 ± 2.76min, p = 0.004), time for cutting the pedicle (1.84 ± 0.7 vs. 1.13 ± 0.51, p = 0.019), aspirated blood loss (171 ± 112 vs. 57 ± 27.8ml, p = 0.006), depth perception (4.5 ± 0.7 vs. 3.3 ± 0.67, p = 0.004), bianual dexterity (4.2 ± 0.78 vs. 3.3 ± 0.67, p = 0.004), tissue handling (4.2 ± 0.91 vs. 3.6 ± 0.66, p = 0.012), and autonomy (4.9 ± 0.31 vs. 3.6 ± 0.96, p = 0.028). There was no difference in time for gallbladder removal (11.58 ± 4.31 vs. 15.08 ± 4.51min, p = 0.096), total operative time (30.8 ± 11.07 vs. 25.60 ± 5.10min, p = 0.188), and efficiency (4 ± 0.66 vs. 3.6 ± 0.69, p = 0.320).The practice of preoperative warm-up training seems to benefit surgical performance even in subject with mild laparoscopic experience.