1104 EARLY RESULTS ON A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL: ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY (RALP) VERSUS RETROPUBIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY (RRP) STUDY

• DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.2620
• Publication Date: 2011-05-19T21:28:23Z
• Authors: Carlo Camargo Pas...; Alberto Azoubel A...; Marcelo Takeo Ruf...; Jose Arnaldo Shio...; Adriano Joao Nesr...; José Pontes; Marcos Freire; Rodrigo Pessoa; Marcos Francisco ...; Miguel Srougi
• Keywords: Radical retropubic prostatectomy

You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Localized1 Apr 20111104 EARLY RESULTS ON A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL: ROBOTIC-ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC PROSTATECTOMY (RALP) VERSUS RETROPUBIC RADICAL (RRP) STUDY Carlo Camargo Passerotti, Alberto Azoubel Antunes, Marcelo Takeo Rufato Okano, Jose Arnaldo Shiomi da Cruz, Adriano Joao Nesrallah, José Pontes, Marcos Freire, Rodrigo Pessoa, Francisco Dall'Oglio, and Miguel Srougi PasserottiCarlo Passerotti Sao Paulo, Brazil More articles by this author , AntunesAlberto Antunes OkanoMarcelo Okano CruzJose Cruz NesrallahAdriano Nesrallah PontesJosé Pontes FreireMarcos Freire PessoaRodrigo Pessoa Dall'OglioMarcos Dall'Oglio SrougiMiguel View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.02.2620AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Currently, there are still several controversies about which technique should be the gold-standard for prostate cancer surgical treatment. Minimally invasive techniques become most frequent procedure performed in United States, considering major impact a choice between RALP RRP may our society medical community, regarding patients better treatment, costs outcomes, we aim present early results first prospective randomized study compare METHODS Two hundred with localized (T1c, T2a e T2b), up 70 years PSA < 15ng/ml; size smaller than 50g at ultrasonography were randomly divided into two groups: 100 submitted other RRP. Assessment was made on intraoperative data, potency assessed through IIEF questionnaire continence ICIQ questionnaire. Regarding data found less aspirated blood loss (291.03ml vs 1018.26ml, p=0.0001). There shorter but not significant operative time open (94.5 min 137.9 RALP, p= 0.14) higher rates positive margins (14% 10%, p=0.01). overall score 1, 3 6 months follow-up favoured over (1 month: 5.89 3.62 – p: 0.05, months: 8.32 2.38 0.0023 10.82 7.40 p=0.04). In hand scores initially (10.3 13.8, 0.013, 1 month follow-up), (12.27 11.19, p=0.878) once again numerically (4.16 6.49, 0.31) . CONCLUSIONS is safe technique. With good initial results, even superior assessment casuistic. Longer trial before can reach conclusion it better. © 2011 American Urological Association Education Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 185Issue 4SApril 2011Page: e444 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Expand PDF downloadLoading ...