Estimating the age of healthy subjects from T1-weighted MRI scans using kernel methods: Exploring the influence of various parameters

• DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.005
• Publication Date: 2010-01-12T05:01:04Z
• Authors: Katja Franke; Gabriel Ziegler; Stefan Klöppel; Christian Gaser
• Keywords: Adult; Aged, 80 and over; Male; 0301 basic medicine; Aging; Principal Component Analysis; Databases, Factual; Health Status; Models, Neurological; Brain; Middle Aged; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; 3. Good health; Automation; Young Adult; 03 medical and health sciences; Alzheimer Disease; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Humans; Regression Analysis; Female; Aged

The early identification of brain anatomy deviating from the normal pattern of growth and atrophy, such as in Alzheimer's disease (AD), has the potential to improve clinical outcomes through early intervention. Recently, Davatzikos et al. (2009) supported the hypothesis that pathologic atrophy in AD is an accelerated aging process, implying accelerated brain atrophy. In order to recognize faster brain atrophy, a model of healthy brain aging is needed first. Here, we introduce a framework for automatically and efficiently estimating the age of healthy subjects from their T(1)-weighted MRI scans using a kernel method for regression. This method was tested on over 650 healthy subjects, aged 19-86 years, and collected from four different scanners. Furthermore, the influence of various parameters on estimation accuracy was analyzed. Our age estimation framework included automatic preprocessing of the T(1)-weighted images, dimension reduction via principal component analysis, training of a relevance vector machine (RVM; Tipping, 2000) for regression, and finally estimating the age of the subjects from the test samples. The framework proved to be a reliable, scanner-independent, and efficient method for age estimation in healthy subjects, yielding a correlation of r=0.92 between the estimated and the real age in the test samples and a mean absolute error of 5 years. The results indicated favorable performance of the RVM and identified the number of training samples as the critical factor for prediction accuracy. Applying the framework to people with mild AD resulted in a mean brain age gap estimate (BrainAGE) score of +10 years.