Performance evaluation of mesoscopic photoacoustic imaging

• DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2023.100505
• Publication Date: 2023-05-06T23:16:55Z
• Authors: Lina Hacker; Emma L. Brown; Thierry L. Lefebvre; Paul W. Sweeney; Sarah E. Bohndiek
• Keywords: Phantom; Raster-Scanning Optoacoustic Mesoscopy (RSOM); Physics; QC1-999; Acoustics. Sound; QC221-246; QC350-467; Optics. Light; Precision; 01 natural sciences; Reproducibility; Photoacoustic mesoscopy; 0103 physical sciences; Repeatability; Research Article

AbstractPhotoacoustic mesoscopy visualises vascular architecture and associated tissue structures at high resolution at up to 3 mm depth. The technique has shown promise in both preclinical and clinical imaging studies, with possible applications in oncology and dermatology, however, the accuracy and precision of photoacoustic mesoscopy has not been well established. Here, we present a performance evaluation of a commercial photoacoustic mesoscopy system for imaging vascular structures. Typical artefact types are first highlighted and limitations due to non-isotropic illumination and detection are evaluated with respect to rotation, angularity, and depth of the target. Then, using tailored phantoms and mouse models we demonstrate high system precision, with acceptable coefficients of variation (COV) between repeated scans (short term (1h): COV=1.2%; long term (25 days): COV=9.6%), from target repositioning (without: COV=1.2%, with: COV=4.1%), or from varyingin vivouser experience (experienced: COV=15.9%, unexperienced: COV=20.2%). While our findings support the robustness of the technique, they also underscore the general challenges of limited field-of-view photoacoustic systems in accurately imaging vessel-like structures, thereby guiding users to correctly interpret biologically-relevant information.