Simulation of ecosystem fluxes with the SCOPE model: Sensitivity to parametrization and evaluation with flux tower observations

• DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2022.113324
• Publication Date: 2022-11-26T00:39:14Z
• Authors: Egor Prikaziuk; Mirco Migliavacca; Zhongbo (Bob) Su; Christiaan van de...
• Keywords: LE; UT-Hybrid-D; 0207 environmental engineering; 02 engineering and technology; 15. Life on land; 01 natural sciences; ECMWF; LAI; 13. Climate action; Ball-Berry slope; Vcmax; SDG 13 - Climate Action; ERA5; GPP; SCOPE model; Sentinel-3; OLCI; ET; SDG 15 - Life on Land; 0105 earth and related environmental sciences

Accurate estimates of carbon, water and energy fluxes between the Earth surface and the atmosphere are crucial for enhancing our understanding of ecosystem–climate interactions. Such estimates can be made by combining remote sensing derived land surface parameters with climate reanalysis data. We analysed to what degree generic (plant functional type (PFT)-independent) satellite-derived vegetation properties and climate reanalysis data can explain land surface fluxes and to what extent the PFT-specific information extends the flux simulations. For this purpose, we used the Soil Canopy Observation, Photochemistry and Energy fluxes (SCOPE) model, which combines radiative transfer in plant leaves and vegetation canopies with photosynthesis and energy balance in a single model representation of the vegetation. We evaluated the performance of SCOPE in simulating fluxes by comparison to 63 eddy covariance sites representing 10 PFTs. We varied the sources of maximum carboxylation capacity (Vcmax25) and BallBerrySlope values (default vs literature), the seasonality of Vcmax25 and the meteorological forcing (locally measured and climate reanalysis). The average performance of daily flux in terms of root-mean-square error (RMSE) was 2.3 ± 0.8 μmol CO2 m−2 s−1 (R2= 0.74 ± 0.12) for gross primary productivity (GPP), 24 ± 8 W m−2 (R2= 0.68 ± 0.16) for latent heat flux (λE) and 50 ± 15 W m−2 (R20.47±0.17) for sensible heat flux (H). The inter-site variability of the annual accumulated GPP flux was captured well with seasonally varying PFT-specific Vcmax25 (R2= 0.74, RMSE = 308 g C m−2 yr−1 and bias = −68 g C m−2 yr−1). The annual accumulated evapotranspiration (ET) was overestimated (R2= 0.31, RMSE = 101 mm yr−1 and bias = 37 mm yr−1), mainly in the ecosystems with subtropical Mediterranean climate, for which the soil resistance to evaporation from porous space (rss) had to be constrained from soil moisture content (SMC) or land surface temperature (LST). Overall, the study demonstrates that SCOPE model can simulate ecosystem flux with high accuracy without site-specific calibration of its parameters.