Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a pan-European multicenter propensity-matched study
Male
610
Middle Aged
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Europe
Pancreatic Neoplasms
Postoperative Complications
Treatment Outcome
Robotic Surgical Procedures
617
Humans
Female
Laparoscopy
Hospital Mortality
Propensity Score
Retrospective Studies
Aged
DOI:
10.1016/j.surg.2024.02.015
Publication Date:
2024-04-03T23:31:50Z
AUTHORS (59)
ABSTRACT
BackgroundThe use of robot-assisted and laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy is increasing, yet large adjusted analyses that can be generalized internationally are lacking. This study aimed to compare outcomes after in a pan-European cohort.MethodsAn international multicenter retrospective including patients from 50 centers 12 European countries (2009–2020). Propensity score matching was performed 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome major morbidity (Clavien–Dindo ≥III).ResultsAmong 2,082 undergoing minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy, 1,006 underwent 1,076 pancreatoduodenectomy. After 812 versus patients, the rates (31.9% vs 29.6%; P = .347) 30-day/in-hospital mortality (4.3% 4.6%; .904) did not differ significantly between respectively. Robot-assisted associated with lower conversion rate (6.7% 18.0%; < .001) higher lymph node retrieval (16 14; .003). Laparoscopic shorter operation time (446 minutes 400 minutes; .001), postoperative pancreatic fistula grade B/C (19.0% 11.7%; delayed gastric emptying (21.4% 7.4%; R0-resection (73.2% 84.4%; .001).ConclusionThis found no differences overall compared Further, fistula, emptying, wound infection, length stay, R0 resection than In contrast, number retrieved nodes as
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (42)
CITATIONS (6)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....