Immunogenicity and safety of Fluzone® intradermal and high-dose influenza vaccines in older adults ≥65 years of age: A randomized, controlled, phase II trial

• DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2013.09.074
• Publication Date: 2013-10-11T10:06:00Z
• Authors: Peter Tsang; Geoffrey J. Gorse; Cynthia B. Strout; Malcolm Sperling; David P. Greenberg; Ayca Ozol-Godfrey; Carlos DiazGranados; Victoria Landolfi
• Keywords: Adult; Male; Adolescent; Injections, Intradermal; Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus; Antibodies, Viral; Injections, Intramuscular; Antibodies; Young Adult; 03 medical and health sciences; Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype; 0302 clinical medicine; Intradermal; Immunology and Microbiology(all); Influenza, Human; Humans; High-dose vaccine; Aged; Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype; Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health; Middle Aged; veterinary(all); 3. Good health; Influenza B virus; Infectious Diseases; Influenza Vaccines; Older adults; Molecular Medicine; Female; Trivalent influenza vaccine; Safety

We conducted a randomized, controlled, multicenter, phase II study to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of an investigational intradermal (ID) trivalent influenza vaccine (TIV) and a high-dose (HD) intramuscular (IM) TIV in older adults (≥65 years of age). Older adult subjects were immunized with ID vaccine containing either 15μg hemagglutinin (HA)/strain (n=636) or 21μg HA/strain (n=634), with HD IM vaccine containing 60μg HA/strain (n=320), or with standard-dose (SD) IM vaccine (Fluzone(®); 15μg HA/strain; n=319). For comparison, younger adults (18-49 years of age) were immunized with SD IM vaccine. In older adults, post-vaccination geometric mean titers induced by the ID vaccines were superior to those induced by the SD IM vaccine for the A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 strains and non-inferior for the B strain. Seroconversion rates induced by the ID vaccines were superior to those induced by the SD IM vaccine in older adults for the A/H1N1 and B strains and non-inferior for the A/H3N2 strain. Results did not differ significantly for the two ID vaccine dosages. Post-vaccination geometric mean titers, seroconversion rates, and most seroprotection rates were significantly higher in HD vaccine recipients than in older adult recipients of the SD IM or ID vaccines and, for most measures, were comparable to those of younger adult SD IM vaccine recipients. Injection-site reactions, but not systemic reactions or unsolicited adverse events, were more common with the ID vaccines than with the IM vaccines. No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. This study demonstrated that: (1) the ID and HD vaccines were well-tolerated and more immunogenic than the SD IM vaccine in older adults; (2) the HD vaccine was more immunogenic than the ID vaccines in older adults; and (3) the HD vaccine in older adults and the SD IM vaccine in younger adults elicited comparable antibody responses (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier no.: NCT00551031).