The association between midwifery staffing levels and the experiences of mothers on postnatal wards: Cross sectional analysis of routine data

• DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2022.02.005
• Publication Date: 2022-02-17T03:56:17Z
• Authors: L. Turner; D. Culliford; J. Ball; E. Kitson-Reynolds; P. Griffiths
• Keywords: Postnatal Care; 610; Continuity of Patient Care; Midwifery; State Medicine; Hospitals; 3. Good health; 618; 03 medical and health sciences; Cross-Sectional Studies; 0302 clinical medicine; Pregnancy; Patient Satisfaction; Workforce; Humans; Female

AbstractBackgroundWomen have consistently reported lower satisfaction with postnatal care compared with antenatal and labour care. The aim of this research was to examine whether women’s experience of inpatient postnatal care in England is associated with variation in midwifery staffing levels.MethodsAnalysis of data from the National Maternity Survey in 2018 including 17,611 women from 129 organisations. This was linked to hospital midwifery staffing numbers from the National Health Service (NHS) Workforce Statistics and the number of births from Hospital Episode Statistics. A two-level logistic regression model was created to examine the association of midwifery staffing levels and experiences in post-natal care.ResultsThe median full time equivalent midwives per 100 births was 3.55 (interquartile range 3.26 to 3.78). Higher staffing levels were associated with less likelihood of women reporting delay in discharge (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.849, 95% CI 0.753 to 0.959, p=0.008), increased chances of women reporting that staff always helped in a reasonable time aOR1.200 (95% CI 1.052, 1.369, p=0.007) and that they always had the information or explanations they needed aOR 1.150 (95% CI 1.040, 1.271, p=0.006). Women were more likely to report being treated with kindness and understanding with higher staffing, but the difference was small and not statistically significant aOR 1.059 (0.949, 1.181, p=0.306).ConclusionsNegative experiences for women on postnatal wards were more likely to occur in trusts with fewer midwives. Low staffing could be contributing to discharge delays and lack of support and information, which may in turn have implications for longer term outcomes for maternal and infant wellbeing.ExplanationWhile we recognise that not all gestational parents identify as women; this term was chosen as it has been used in the data source which was accessed for this study and represents most people having maternities.Statement of significance (problem)Women report negative experiences of postnatal care compared with antenatal care and birth. There is a recognised shortage of midwives in maternity services, and this may be impacting on the quality of postnatal care.What is already known?There is evidence that midwifery staffing levels are associated with birth outcomes but little empirical evidence on the impact of midwifery staffing levels in postnatal careWhat this paper adds?This analysis of survey data supports previous findings that increased midwifery staffing is associated with benefits. This is the first study to examine the effects of staffing on women’s experience of postnatal care.