Populism and Candidate Support in the US: The Effects of “Thin” and “Host” Ideology
Populism
Elitism
Pluralism
Elite
Divergence (linguistics)
DOI:
10.1017/xps.2022.9
Publication Date:
2022-06-16T06:38:51Z
AUTHORS (3)
ABSTRACT
Abstract Much of the contemporary literature on populism focuses its status as a “thin” ideology comprising three key components: people-centrism, anti-elitism, and anti-pluralism. Populist politicians pair this with extreme positions policy issues such immigration or taxation (referred to “host” “thick” ideologies). A recent study using German samples leveraged conjoint experiments disentangle effects these appeals vote choice. The results not only showed that host-ideological mattered more than so-called populist appeals, but also were nearly identical among non-populist voters. Our replication in US context reaffirms both importance lack heterogeneous by voters’ attitudes. Furthermore, uncovering some divergence from case (e.g. anti-elite trumping people-centric appeals), we highlight need experimentally examine populism’s constituent components across contexts.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (32)
CITATIONS (20)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....