Toward Accurate Conformational Energies of Smaller Peptides and Medium-Sized Macrocycles: MPCONF196 Benchmark Energy Data Set
Benchmark (surveying)
Data set
DOI:
10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01074
Publication Date:
2018-02-20T19:26:33Z
AUTHORS (4)
ABSTRACT
A carefully selected set of acyclic and cyclic model peptides several other macrocycles, comprising 13 compounds in total, has been used to calibrate the accuracy DFT(-D3) method for conformational energies, employing BP86, PBE0, PBE, B3LYP, BLYP, TPSS, TPSSh, M06-2X, B97-D, OLYP, revPBE, M06-L, SCAN, revTPSS, BH-LYP, ωB97X-D3 functionals. Both high- low-energy conformers, 15 or 16 each compound adding 196 denoted as MPCONF196 data set, were included, reference values obtained by composite protocol, yielding CCSD(T)/CBS extrapolated energies their DLPNO-CCSD(T)/CBS equivalents case larger systems. The latter was shown be near-quantitative (∼0.10–0.15 kcal·mol–1) agreement with canonical CCSD(T), provided TightPNO setting is used, and, therefore, can systems (likely up 150–200 atoms) problem studied here. At same time, it found that many D3-corrected DFT functionals provide results ∼1 kcal·mol–1 accuracy, which we consider quite encouraging. This result implies DFT-D3 methods be, example, safely efficient sampling algorithms. Specifically, DFT-D3/DZVP-DFT level calculation seems best trade-off between computational cost accuracy. Based on calculated data, have not any cheaper variant treatment since semiempirical (including DFTB) inferior (errors 3–5 kcal·mol–1).
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (101)
CITATIONS (86)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....