Spatial contrast sensitivity: effects of reliability, test–retest repeatability and sample size using the Metropsis software

• DOI: 10.1038/s41433-019-0477-0
• Publication Date: 2019-06-05T10:03:07Z
• Authors: Thiago Paiva Fern...; Natalia Leandro d...; Pamela D. Butler; Natanael Antonio ...
• Keywords: Adult; Male; Vision, Binocular; Vision Tests; Visual Acuity; Reproducibility of Results; Middle Aged; Mental Status and Dementia Tests; Contrast Sensitivity; Young Adult; 03 medical and health sciences; Spatial Processing; 0302 clinical medicine; Humans; Female; Software

The goals of the study were to further assess contrast sensitivity to (1) investigate the existence of monocular vs. binocular differences; (2) observe possible differences between sample sizes; (3) investigate the effects of test-retest repeatability.Contrast sensitivity measurements were obtained by presenting eight horizontal sine-wave gratings (ranging from 0.2 to 20 cycles per degree). A three-up-one-down method was used to obtain thresholds with a criterion of 79.4% correct responses for each spatial frequency. The mean of 12 reversals was used for obtaining thresholds, and the two-alternative forced-choice method was used. Data were recorded in 55 naive observers from 20 to 45 years. All participants were free from identifiable ocular disease and had normal visual acuity.We observed the absence of differences on CSF for both monocular and binocular observers, as well as the absence of differences between large sample sizes. The latter investigation revealed a high degree of repeatability across time (baseline to 6 months later) with the higher test-retest for low and high spatial frequencies.Our results indicated that spatial contrast sensitivity measurements were little influenced by variables, such as binocular summation, eye dominance, sample size and time using the Metropsis test. The results obtained here have significance for basic and clinical vision science.