Impact of deprivation and rural residence on treatment of colorectal and lung cancer

• DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600515
• Publication Date: 2002-09-25T10:58:03Z
• Authors: N C Campbell; A M Elliott; L Sharp; L D Ritchie; J Cassidy; J Little
• Keywords: Male; Rural Population; Lung Neoplasms; Cohort Studies; Clinical; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Confidence Intervals; Humans; Carcinoma, Small Cell; Poverty; Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Aged, 80 and over; Middle Aged; Prognosis; 3. Good health; Survival Rate; Scotland; Socioeconomic Factors; Female; Colorectal Neoplasms; Delivery of Health Care

For common cancers, survival is poorer for deprived and outlying, rural patients. This study investigated whether there were differences in treatment of colorectal and lung cancer in these groups. Case notes of 1314 patients in north and northeast Scotland who were diagnosed with lung or colorectal cancer in 1995 or 1996 were reviewed. On univariate analysis, the proportions of patients receiving surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy appeared similar in all socio-economic and rural categories. Adjusting for disease stage, age and other factors, there was less chemotherapy among deprived patients with lung cancer (odds ratio 0.39; 95% confidence intervals 0.16 to 0.96) and less radiotherapy among outlying patients with colorectal cancer (0.39; 0.19 to 0.82). The time between first referral and treatment also appeared similar in all socio-economic and rural groups. Adjusting for disease stage and other variables, times to lung cancer treatment remained similar, but colorectal cancer treatment was quicker for outlying patients (adjusted hazard ratio 1.30; 95% confidence intervals 1.03 to 1.64). These findings suggest that socio-economic status and rurality may have a minor impact on modalities of treatment for colorectal and lung cancer, but do not lead to delays between referral and treatment.