Stepwise acquisition of pyrimethamine resistance in the malaria parasite

• DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0905922106
• Publication Date: 2009-07-09T01:57:07Z
• Authors: Elena R. Lozovsky; Thanat Chookajorn; Kyle M. Brown; Mallika Imwong; Philip J. Shaw; Sumalee Kamchonwo...; Daniel E. Neafsey; Daniel M. Weinreich; Daniel L. Hartl
• Keywords: 570; 0303 health sciences; drug resistance; Polymorphism, Genetic; Plasmodium falciparum; Drug Resistance; 500; 3. Good health; Evolution, Molecular; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Tetrahydrofolate Dehydrogenase; 03 medical and health sciences; Pyrimethamine; evolution; adaptive landscape; Animals; Biological Assay; Parasites; Malaria, Falciparum; Alleles

The spread of high-level pyrimethamine resistance in Africa threatens to curtail the therapeutic lifetime of antifolate antimalarials. We studied the possible evolutionary pathways in the evolution of pyrimethamine resistance using an approach in which all possible mutational intermediates were created by site-directed mutagenesis and assayed for their level of drug resistance. The coding sequence for dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) from the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum was mutagenized, and tests were carried out in Escherichia coli under conditions in which the endogenous bacterial enzyme was selectively inhibited. We studied 4 key amino acid replacements implicated in pyrimethamine resistance: N51I, C59R, S108N, and I164L. Using empirical estimates of the mutational spectrum in P. falciparum and probabilities of fixation based on the relative levels of resistance, we found that the predicted favored pathways of drug resistance are consistent with those reported in previous kinetic studies, as well as DHFR polymorphisms observed in natural populations. We found that 3 pathways account for nearly 90% of the simulated realizations of the evolution of pyrimethamine resistance. The most frequent pathway (S108N and then C59R, N51I, and I164L) accounts for more than half of the simulated realizations. Our results also suggest an explanation for why I164L is detected in Southeast Asia and South America, but not at significant frequencies in Africa.