Life cycle air quality impacts of conventional and alternative light-duty transportation in the United States
Male
Transportation
Models, Theoretical
01 natural sciences
7. Clean energy
United States
3. Good health
Ozone
13. Climate action
Air Pollution, Indoor
Biofuels
11. Sustainability
Humans
Female
Renewable Energy
Gasoline
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.1406853111
Publication Date:
2014-12-16T03:25:14Z
AUTHORS (3)
ABSTRACT
Significance Our assessment of the life cycle air quality impacts on human health 10 alternatives to conventional gasoline vehicles finds that electric (EVs) powered by electricity from natural gas or wind, water, solar power are best for improving quality, whereas corn ethanol and EVs coal worst. This work advances current debate over environmental versus alternative transportation options combining detailed spatially temporally explicit emissions inventories with state-of-the-science impact analysis using advanced chemical transport modeling. results reinforce previous findings quality-related damages generally comparable larger than climate change-related damages.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (53)
CITATIONS (200)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....