Life cycle air quality impacts of conventional and alternative light-duty transportation in the United States

Male Transportation Models, Theoretical 01 natural sciences 7. Clean energy United States 3. Good health Ozone 13. Climate action Air Pollution, Indoor Biofuels 11. Sustainability Humans Female Renewable Energy Gasoline 0105 earth and related environmental sciences
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1406853111 Publication Date: 2014-12-16T03:25:14Z
ABSTRACT
Significance Our assessment of the life cycle air quality impacts on human health 10 alternatives to conventional gasoline vehicles finds that electric (EVs) powered by electricity from natural gas or wind, water, solar power are best for improving quality, whereas corn ethanol and EVs coal worst. This work advances current debate over environmental versus alternative transportation options combining detailed spatially temporally explicit emissions inventories with state-of-the-science impact analysis using advanced chemical transport modeling. results reinforce previous findings quality-related damages generally comparable larger than climate change-related damages.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (53)
CITATIONS (200)