The facilitators and barriers to improving functional activity and wellbeing in people with dementia: a qualitative study from the process evaluation of Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED)

• DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad166
• Publication Date: 2023-08-21T19:41:55Z
• Authors: Claudio Di Lorito; Veronika van der ...; Kristian Pollock; Louise Howe; Vicky Booth; Pip Logan; John Gladman; Tahir Masud; Roshan das Nair; Sarah Goldberg; Kavita Vedhara; Rebecca O’Brien; Emma Adams; Alison Cowley; Alessandro Bosco; Jennie Hancox; Clare Burgon; Rupinder Bajwa; Juliette Lock; Annabelle Long; Maureen Godfrey; Marianne Dunlop; Rowan H Harwood
• Keywords: exercise; COVID-19; 16. Peace & justice; process evaluation; 3. Good health; older people; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Qualitative Paper; Activities of Daily Living; Quality of Life; Humans; Dementia; Pandemics; qualitative research; dementia

AbstractBackgroundThe PRomoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED) study delivered an exercise and functional activity programme to participants living with dementia. A Randomised Controlled Trial showed no measurable benefits in activities of daily living, physical activity or quality of life.ObjectiveTo explore participants’ responses to PrAISED and explain why an intervention that might be expected to have produced measurable health gains did not do so.MethodsA process evaluation using qualitative methods, comprising interviews and researcher notes.SettingData were collected in participants’ homes or remotely by telephone or videoconferencing.SampleA total of 88 interviews were conducted with 44 participants living with dementia (n = 32 intervention group; n = 12 control group) and 39 caregivers. A total of 69 interviews were conducted with 26 therapists.ResultsParticipants valued the intervention as proactively addressing health issues that were of concern to them, and as a source of social contact, interaction, information and advice. Facilitators to achieving positive outcomes included perceiving progress towards desired goals, positive expectations, therapists’ skills and rapport with participants, and caregiver support. Barriers included: cognitive impairment, which prevented independent engagement and carry-over between sessions; chronic physical health problems and intercurrent acute illness and injury; ‘tapering’ (progressively infrequent supervision intended to help develop habits and independent activity); and the COVID-19 pandemic.ConclusionsSelf-directed interventions may not be appropriate in the context of dementia, even in the mild stages of the condition. Dementia-specific factors affected outcomes including caregiver support, rapport with therapists, availability of supervision, motivational factors and the limitations of remote delivery. The effects of cognitive impairment, multimorbidity and frailty overwhelmed any positive impact of the intervention. Maintenance of functional ability is valued, but in the face of inevitable progression of disease, other less tangible outcomes become important, challenging how we frame ‘health gain’ and trial outcomes.