Mid-term follow up after an acute aortic syndrome episode: when the storm is over
Acute aortic syndrome
DOI:
10.1093/ehjacc/zuaf044.210
Publication Date:
2025-04-23T11:06:53Z
AUTHORS (14)
ABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction High morbidity and mortality associated with acute aortic syndrome (AAS) reinforces the need for close expert professional’s follow-up. However, guidelines do not specify how often or what complementary tests during this process should be performed. The aim of present study was to analyse prognosis patients who survived AAS phase, describing comorbidities, complications, short- mid-term mortality. Methods We collected prospectively consecutively diagnosis treated in a tertiary hospital from 2019 2024. At discharge, follow-up specific pathology monographic clinic proposed. Follow up divided into three period times: 6 months, 1 year 2 years. Clinical, analytical, imaging, therapeutic prognostic variables were collected. A descriptive analysis complications Results 132 Patients included period, whom 78 (60%) continued followed at discharge: 53 (68%) type 25 (32%) B AAS. Throughout most them evaluated (Table). numerous presented more mid- long-term complications: among these, renal failure electrocardiogram conduction disturbances frequent. quarter remained symptomatic months after earlier improvement proportion requiring reintervention low In addition, equally low, reaching less than 10% 0% 2-year (Table 1). Finally, causes non-cardiovascular non-related majority cases. Conclusions Although evolution is extent once phase has overcome, cardiovascular medium- low. regard, by specialized clinicians essential, given complexity cases multidisciplinary evaluation.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (0)
CITATIONS (0)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....