Myth-busting the provider-user relationship for digital sequence information

• DOI: 10.1093/gigascience/giab085
• Publication Date: 2021-12-30T04:03:33Z
• Authors: Amber Hartman Scholz; Matthias Lange; Pia Habekost; Paul Oldham; Ibon Cancio; Guy Cochrane; Jens Freitag
• Keywords: 0301 basic medicine; 0303 health sciences; Research; International Cooperation; Biodiversity; 16. Peace & justice; UN Convention on Biological Diversity; access and benefit sharing; 03 medical and health sciences; INSDC; digital sequence information; Nagoya protocol; provider user

Abstract

Background The United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) formally recognized the sovereign rights of nations over their biological diversity. Implicit within the treaty is the idea that mega-biodiverse countries will provide genetic resources and grant access to them and scientists in high-income countries will use these resources and share back benefits. However, little research has been conducted on how this framework is reflected in real-life scientific practice.

Result Currently, parties to the CBD are debating whether digital sequence information (DSI) should be regulated under a new benefit-sharing framework. At this critical time point in the upcoming international negotiations, we test the fundamental hypothesis of provision and use of DSI by looking at the global patterns of access and use in scientific publications.

Conclusion Our data reject the provider-user relationship and suggest a far more complex information flow for DSI. Therefore, any new policy decisions on DSI should be aware of the high level of use of DSI across low- and middle-income countries and seek to preserve open access to this crucial common good.