Managerial Conservatism, Project Choice, and Debt

Leverage (statistics) Conservatism Agency cost
DOI: 10.1093/rfs/5.3.437 Publication Date: 2002-07-26T18:58:17Z
ABSTRACT
We show that the incentive for managers to build their reputations distorts firms' investment policies in favor of relatively safe projects, thereby aligning managers' interests with those bondholders, even though are hired and fired by shareholders. This effect opposes familiar agency problem risky debt is imperfectly covenant-protected, wherein shareholders tempted excessively projects order expropriate bondholders. Consequently, when managerial concern reputation results conservatism, it can actually make better off ex ante allowing firm issue more debt. examine how optimal choice leverage from shareholders' standpoint influenced takeover activity, adoption antitakeover measures affects a firm's policy choice.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (44)
CITATIONS (398)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....