PD39-07 DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF POST-CRYOABLATION MRI FOR RESIDUAL PROSTATE CANCER

Cryoablation Cryosurgery
DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0001008924.16121.42.07 Publication Date: 2024-04-15T21:33:57Z
ABSTRACT
You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Localized: Ablative Therapy II (PD39)1 May 2024PD39-07 DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF POST-CRYOABLATION MRI FOR RESIDUAL PROSTATE CANCER Piroz Bahar, Eugene Oh, Karan Desai, Matthew Jordan, Davenport, Jeffrey S. Montgomery, and Arvin K. George BaharPiroz Bahar , OhEugene Oh DesaiKaran Desai JordanMatthew Jordan DavenportMatthew Davenport MontgomeryJeffrey Montgomery GeorgeArvin View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/01.JU.0001008924.16121.42.07AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Assessing oncological success following focal ablation for prostate cancer (PCa) includes PSA response imaging. However, the value protocol biopsy remains uncertain. Consensus recommendations include follow-up multi-parametric (mpMRI) despite variable imaging quality, interpretation, performance. We aim determine mpMRI performance characteristics post-ablation in-field (within zone) failure cryoablation. METHODS: Patients receiving cryoablation from 01/01/2017 04/21/2023 were enrolled in a multi-institutional, IRB-approved, prospective registry. Per protocol, PSA, mpMRI, ultrasound-MR fusion bed obtained at 6 months post-ablation. Residual PCa was suspected on if there persistent enhancement impeded diffusion within intended zone. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive (PPV), negative (NPV) Gleason Grade Group (GG) ≥2 calculated. Chi-squared test used perform bivariate analysis. RESULTS: 108 patients undergoing 118 cryoablations enrolled. Patient-level are presented Table 1. Post-primary performed 91 patients; 10 underwent repeat Seven post-repeat (N=98 events). Post-ablation showed possible residual 11.2% (11/98). target lesion GG≥2 10.2% (10/98) patients. MpMRI sensitivity, PPV, NPV detecting 71.4%, 95.3%, 55.6%, 97.6%, respectively. Primary analysis significant association between suspicion disease detection [p<0.0001]. Secondary excluding data (N=91) 94.9%, 97.4%, CONCLUSIONS: has high NPV, sensitivity when negative, could be defer near-term "protocol" biopsy. Future investigation into causes false will help identify those who warrant per-protocol Source Funding: N/A © 2024 by American Urological Association Education Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 211Issue 5SMay 2024Page: e815 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© Inc.Metrics Information More articles this author Expand PDF downloadLoading ...
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (0)
CITATIONS (0)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....