A Comparison of the Separation Ratio and Coefficient α in the Creation of Minimum Item Sets
Aged, 80 and over
Male
Psychometrics
Reproducibility of Results
Cataract Extraction
Recovery of Function
Models, Theoretical
Self Efficacy
United States
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Activities of Daily Living
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Quality of Life
Humans
Female
Vision, Ocular
Aged
Probability
Retrospective Studies
DOI:
10.1097/01.mlr.0000103522.78233.c3
Publication Date:
2003-12-19T09:05:13Z
AUTHORS (3)
ABSTRACT
Short-form outcomes measures are becoming common in response to demands for increased efficiency in health care. This study examines Rasch measurement as an aid to selecting items for short form tests. The focus of this paper is on maintaining test quality while reducing items. The separation ratio (SR) aids item reduction by indicating how removing items impacts measurement precision. Results of the SR and coefficient alpha are compared.To demonstrate the use of Rasch measurement to shorten clinical outcomes measures and to compare the separation ratio and coefficient alpha in evaluating when item reduction improved efficiency without sacrificing measurement precision.Retrospective analysis of existing health outcomes data.A convenience sample of 58 patients receiving cataract surgery.The 14 items of the VF-14 (a measure of visual functioning), the published subset of items from this test (the VF-7), and 5 other 7-item combinations of the items.The largest coefficient alpha was obtained from the VF14 (.84) while the largest separation ratio (2.67) was obtained from the 7-item subtest with the reduced rating scale.This study demonstrated one way that Rasch measurement can be helpful in selecting items for minimum item sets while maintaining test precision. Both alpha and the separation ratio provide information about how a sample performed with a given test although variations in measurement precision may not always be detected with alpha.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (22)
CITATIONS (63)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....