Perineural Clonidine Does Not Prolong Levobupivacaine 0.5% After Sciatic Nerve Block Using the Labat Approach in Foot and Ankle Surgery
Levobupivacaine
Foot (prosody)
DOI:
10.1097/aap.0b013e3182606168
Publication Date:
2012-12-18T18:24:28Z
AUTHORS (4)
ABSTRACT
<h3>Background</h3> There is controversy about the effectiveness of perineural clonidine used as an adjuvant to local anesthetics. This study investigated whether addition 150 μg 0.5% levobupivacaine for posterior sciatic nerve block would prolong duration analgesia. <h3>Methods</h3> double-blind, prospective trial compared analgesic characteristics 20 mL plain versus plus in a (Labat approach) foot and ankle surgery. Sixty patients were randomized allocated receive either alone or clonidine, find 30% prolongation analgesia with adjuvant, using same SD. The onset (time from completion administration first morphine request), hemodynamic changes during surgery, need rescue analgesia, technical neurologic complications assessed over 24-hour period. <h3>Results</h3> sensory (in minutes) was similar groups (10 [5–20] vs 10 [5–23] minutes, median [interquartile range], respectively), time request pain medication (1215 [920–1530] 1275 [1067–1360] respectively). However, statistically significantly more subjects group than experienced decrease 20% systolic arterial pressure (50% 28% patients, respectively; <i>P</i> < 0.028). No noted 24 hours. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Addition gluteal (Labat) did not but had slight effect on pressure.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (15)
CITATIONS (12)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....