Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE)

• DOI: 10.1097/ede.0b013e3181577511
• Publication Date: 2009-03-03T23:01:00Z
• Authors: Jan P. Vandenbroucke; Erik von Elm; Douglas G. Altman; Peter C. Gøtzsche; Cynthia D. Mulrow; Stuart J. Pocock; Charles Poole; James J. Schlesse...; Matthias Egger
• Keywords: Research Report; Biomedical Research; strobe; 610; cross-sectional studies; 610 Medicine & health; Guidelines as Topic; Observation; Pediatrics; RJ1-570; Cohort Studies; 03 medical and health sciences; study design; 0302 clinical medicine; cohort studies; 360 Social problems & social services; observational studies; Publishing; case-control studies; R; Checklist; 3. Good health; Observational Studies as Topic; Epidemiologic Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Research Design; Case-Control Studies; Epidemiologic Research Design; Medicine; Surgery; reporting of observational studies; Research Article

Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalisability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies and four are specific to each of the three study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors and readers. This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, one or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www. strobe-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research. Present article is Russian-language translation of the original manuscript edited by Doctor of Medicine R.T. Saygitov.Present translation was first published in Digital Diagnostics. doi: 10.17816/DD70821. It is published with minor changes related to the literary editing of the translation itself.