Diagnosis and Treatment of Blunt Thoracic Aortic Injuries: Changing Perspectives
Aortography
Paraplegia
Cardiothoracic surgery
Aortic repair
DOI:
10.1097/ta.0b013e3181715e32
Publication Date:
2009-03-05T18:02:41Z
AUTHORS (23)
ABSTRACT
Background: The diagnosis and management of blunt thoracic aortic injuries has undergone many significant changes over the last decade. present study compares clinical practices results between an earlier prospective multicenter by American Association for Surgery Trauma completed in 1997 (AAST1) a new similar 2007 (AAST2). Methods: AAST1 included 274 patients from 50 participating centers period 30 months. AAST2 193 18 centers, 26 comparisons two studies method definitive injury [computed tomography (CT) scan, aortography, transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) or magnetic resonance imaging], repair (open vs. endovascular repair, clamp sew bypass techniques), time to procedure (early delayed repair), outcomes (survival, procedure-related paraplegia, other complications). Results: There was major shift injury, aortography CT scan AAST2, nearly complete elimination TEE study. In made 93.3%, 8.3%, 1.0% when compared with 34.8%, 87.0%, 11.9%, respectively, (p < 0.001). mean increased 16.5 hours 54.6 study, all were managed open whereas only 35.2% remaining 64.8% stent-grafts. use techniques 64.7% 83.8%. overall mortality, excluding extremis, decreased significantly 22.0% 13.0% = 0.02). Also, incidence paraplegia planned operation, 8.7% 1.6% However, early graft-related complications 0.5% 18.4% Conclusions: Comparison AAST showed widespread almost TEE. concept gained wide acceptance. Endovascular replaced great extent. These have resulted reduction mortality but also increase complications.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (19)
CITATIONS (153)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....