Emotion processing in three systems: The medium and the message

• DOI: 10.1111/1469-8986.3650619
• Publication Date: 2004-12-28T14:35:15Z
• Authors: Robert F. Simons; Benjamin H. Detenber; Thomas M. Roedema; Jason E. Reiss
• Keywords: Adult; Male; Analysis of Variance; Emotions; 05 social sciences; Motion Perception; Heart Rate; Humans; Attention; Female; 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences; Cues; Arousal

In the context of picture viewing, consistent and specific relationships have been found between two emotion dimensions (valence and arousal) and self‐report, physiological and overt behavioral responses. Relationships between stimulus content and the emotion‐response profile can also be modulated by the formal properties of stimulus presentation such as screen size. The present experiment explored the impact of another presentation attribute, stimulus motion, on the perceived quality of the induced emotion and on its associated physiological response pattern. Using a within‐subject design, moving and still versions of emotion‐eliciting stimuli were shown to 35 subjects while facial muscle, heart rate, skin conductance, and emotion self‐reports were monitored. The impact of motion was dramatic. Self‐report and physiological data suggested strongly that motion increased arousal, had little impact on valence, and captured and sustained the subject's attention to the image.