Social axioms and psychological toll: A study of emotional, behavioral, and cognitive responses across 35 cultures during the COVID‐19 pandemic

• DOI: 10.1111/aphw.12545
• Publication Date: 2024-05-09T11:24:36Z
• Authors: Frank Tian‐fang Ye; Bryant P. H. Hui; Jacky C. K. Ng; Ben C. P. Lam; Algae K. Y. Au; Wesley C. H. Wu; Hilary K. Y. Ng; Sylvia Xiaohua Chen
• Keywords: 0302 clinical medicine; Psychological responses; Well-being; 150; COVID-19; 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences; Social axioms; Trust

AbstractThe COVID‐19 pandemic has significantly affected the psychological well‐being of individuals worldwide. Previous research has indicated that values and beliefs, particularly social axioms, are associated with psychological responses during crises. However, most of the studies have focused on specific regions; the impact of social axioms on a global scale remains unclear. We conducted a multinational study comprising stratified samples of 18,171 participants from 35 cultures. Using multilevel modeling, we examined the associations between social axioms, personal worry, normative concerns, trust, and individuals' psychological responses to the pandemic. The results showed that greater personal worry and normative concerns predicted more negative psychological responses. Furthermore, the study also identified significant buffering effects at the societal level, as cultures with higher overall levels of fate control, religiosity, or reward for application exhibited weaker associations between personal worry and negative responses. Our findings reveal the influence of social axioms on psychological responses during the pandemic, with varying effects across cultures. The buffering effects of fate control, religiosity, and reward for application underscore the importance of considering cultural differences and individual variability when examining the impact of social axioms on psychological outcomes.