Prevalence and Clinical Symptoms of Wheat Allergy in Adults and Adolescents in Central Europe

• DOI: 10.1111/cea.70017
• Publication Date: 2025-02-20T06:44:42Z
• Authors: A. Neyer; S. Dölle‐Bierke; V. Höfer; J. Grünhagen; K. Beyer; M. Worm

ABSTRACTBackgroundWheat is a well‐known elicitor of food allergy, but epidemiological data are limited. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of wheat allergy in an unselected population of adults and adolescents and to characterise the clinical features of this cohort, as well as those of patients who experienced wheat‐induced anaphylaxis.MethodsA population‐based cross‐sectional study was conducted. Fifteen thousand individuals aged 12–80 years were randomly selected, and a standardised questionnaire was applied. If symptoms after wheat consumption were reported, telephone interviews were conducted. In the case of suspected type 1 wheat allergy, a skin prick test, specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) and oral food challenge (OFC) were performed. The prevalence of self‐reported wheat sensitivity and wheat allergy was determined after data extrapolation. For the assessment of severe wheat allergy‐associated symptoms, a cohort from the European Anaphylaxis Registry was analysed.ResultsThe questionnaire was answered by 1770 individuals, of whom 13.1% reported symptoms due to the consumption of foods containing wheat. Following telephone interviews (n = 105) and clinical diagnostics (n = 22), type 1 sensitisation to wheat was confirmed in 8 individuals, and 2 subjects were finally diagnosed with an IgE‐mediated wheat allergy. After extrapolation, the prevalence of confirmed wheat allergy in the German population reached 0.25% [95% CI 0.08–0.9]. Self‐reported wheat sensitivity was predominantly seen in females (71%), with local gastrointestinal and non‐specific symptoms. This contrasted with wheat‐induced anaphylaxis, where less than half occurred in females, and symptoms were mainly skin, cardiovascular or respiratory.ConclusionIn a population with widespread wheat consumption, self‐reported wheat sensitivity was common in adults and adolescents, but confirmed wheat allergy was rare. The distinct symptom profiles allow physicians to easily differentiate these entities. Dissemination of our findings may help to improve knowledge of the low prevalence of wheat allergy and may support the reduction of unnecessary dietary restrictions.