Are There Cross‐Cultural Legal Principles? Modal Reasoning Uncovers Procedural Constraints on Law
Cross-Cultural Comparison
340
concepts
NORMATIVE DIMENSION
05 social sciences
Modality
Social Sciences
Human universals
natural law
human universals
16. Peace & justice
DUAL CHARACTER CONCEPTS
Lon Fuller
experimental jurisprudence
Natural law
Experimental
Psychology
Humans
concepts ; experimental jurisprudence ; human universals ; lon fuller ; modality ; natural law
modality
0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Experimental jurisprudence
Concepts
Retrospective Studies
DOI:
10.1111/cogs.13024
Publication Date:
2021-08-11T12:42:30Z
AUTHORS (16)
ABSTRACT
AbstractDespite pervasive variation in the content of laws, legal theorists and anthropologists have argued that laws share certain abstract features and even speculated that law may be a human universal. In the present report, we evaluate this thesis through an experiment administered in 11 different countries. Are there cross‐cultural principles of law? In a between‐subjects design, participants (N= 3,054) were asked whether there could be laws that violate certain procedural principles (e.g., laws applied retrospectively or unintelligible laws), and also whether there are any such laws. Confirming our preregistered prediction, people reported that such laws cannot exist, but also (paradoxically) that there are such laws. These results document cross‐culturally and –linguistically robust beliefs about the concept of law which defy people's grasp of how legal systems function in practice.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (42)
CITATIONS (30)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....