How can the European Common Agricultural Policy help halt biodiversity loss? Recommendations by over 300 experts

0106 biological sciences 330 Monitoring agri‐environment‐climate measures Agricultural Biotechnology Eco‐schemes Eco-Schemes QH1-199.5 01 natural sciences 630 12. Responsible consumption Farmland biodiversity farmland biodiversity [SDV.EE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology Green architecture 11. Sustainability agri-environment-climate measures; Common Agricultural Policy; Eco-schemes; European Union; farmland biodiversity; green architecture; monitoring; science-policy; strategic plans European Union Strategic plans Science-policy agri-environment-climate measures [SDV.EE]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Ecology, environment 2. Zero hunger Green Architecture Agricultural Sciences Common agricultural policy Agri-environment-climate measures General. Including nature conservation, geographical distribution strategic plans 15. Life on land Biología y Biomedicina / Biología Eco-schemes monitoring green architecture 13. Climate action [SDE]Environmental Sciences Farmland Biodiversity science-policy environment Common Agricultural Policy
DOI: 10.1111/conl.12901 Publication Date: 2022-06-30T11:02:19Z
ABSTRACT
AbstractThe European Union's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) has not halted farmland biodiversity loss. The CAP post‐2023 has a new ‘‘Green Architecture,’’ including the new ‘‘Eco‐scheme’’ instrument. How can this new Green Architecture help tackle the biodiversity crisis? Through 13 workshops and an online survey, over 300 experts from 23 European Member States addressed this question.From experts’ contributions, key principles for success include preserving and restoring (semi)natural elements and extensive grasslands; improving spatial planning and landscape‐scale implementation, including through collective actions; implementing result‐based approaches; and improved knowledge exchange. To maximize the effectiveness of Eco‐scheme for biodiversity, experts highlighted the need to prioritize evidence‐based actions, allocate a sufficient budget for biodiversity, and incentivize management improvements through higher payment levels. Additionally, stronger coherence is needed among CAP instruments.For effective CAP implementation, the European Commission and the Member States should expand investments in biodiversity monitoring, knowledge transfer, and capacity‐building within relevant institutions. The remaining risks in the CAP's ability to reverse the loss of farmland biodiversity still require better design, closer monitoring, greater transparency, and better engagement with farmers. Additionally, greater involvement of scientists is needed to guide the CAP toward restoring farmland biodiversity while accounting for synergies and trade‐offs with other objectives.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (34)
CITATIONS (79)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....