Tailoring evidence into action: Using a co‐design approach for biodiversity information in the Tropical Andes
570
Bolivia
Public relations
mainstreaming
Economics
FOS: Political science
essential biodiversity variables
QH1-199.5
Biodiversity conservation
333
Environmental science
12. Responsible consumption
EBV
11. Sustainability
Peru
Stakeholder
Business
Environmental resource management
Political science
Biology
QH540-549.5
Environmental planning
Global and Planetary Change
Species Distribution Modeling and Climate Change Impacts
Global Analysis of Ecosystem Services and Land Use
Geography
Ecology
Ecological Modeling
Measurement of biodiversity
General. Including nature conservation, geographical distribution
Biodiversity
15. Life on land
Interoperability
Computer science
Process (computing)
World Wide Web
Operating system
13. Climate action
FOS: Biological sciences
Environmental Science
Physical Sciences
Human-Nature Interactions
ddc:570
Ecuador
Drivers and Impacts of Tropical Deforestation
DOI:
10.1111/csp2.13035
Publication Date:
2023-11-03T11:29:52Z
AUTHORS (19)
ABSTRACT
AbstractBiodiversity conservation is a complex and transdisciplinary problem that requires engagement and cooperation among scientific, societal, economic, and political institutions. However, historical approaches have often failed to bring together and address the needs of all relevant stakeholders in decision‐making processes. The Tropical Andes, a biodiversity hotspot where conservation efforts often conflict with socioeconomic issues and policies that prioritize economic development, provides an ideal model to develop and implement more effective approaches. In this study, we present a co‐design approach that mainstreams and improves the flow of biodiversity information in the Tropical Andes, while creating tailored outputs that meet the needs of economic and societal stakeholders. We employed a consultative process that brought together biodiversity information users and producers at the local, national, and regional levels through a combination of surveys and workshops. This approach identified priority needs and limitations of the flow of biodiversity information in the region, which led to the co‐design of user‐relevant biodiversity indicators. By leveraging the existing capacities of biodiversity information users and producers, we were able to co‐design multiple biodiversity indicators and prioritize two for full implementation ensuring that the data was findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable based on the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) principles. This approach helped address limitations that were identified in the stakeholder engagement process, including gaps in data availability and the need for more accessible biodiversity information. Additionally, capacity‐building workshops were incorporated for all producers of biodiversity information involved, which aimed to not only improve the current flow of biodiversity information in the region but also facilitate its future sustainability. Our approach can serve as a valuable blueprint for mainstreaming biodiversity information and making it more inclusive in the future, especially considering the diverse worldviews, values, and knowledge systems between science, policy, and practice.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (75)
CITATIONS (2)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....