Motivating government on threatened species through electoral systems

• DOI: 10.1111/csp2.13206
• Publication Date: 2024-08-10T04:39:50Z
• Authors: Gareth S. Kindler; Alexander M. Kusm...; Stephen Kearney; Michelle Ward; Richard A. Fuller; Thomas J. Lloyd; Sarah A. Bekessy; Emily A. Gregg; Romola Stewart; James E. M. Watson
• Keywords: 0106 biological sciences; Environmental management; democracy; Ecology; political representation; General. Including nature conservation, geographical distribution; QH1-199.5; 333; Forestry sciences; elected representatives; electoral accountability; electoral districts; QH540-549.5; biodiversity

AbstractMany of the proposed solutions to the global biodiversity crisis rely on national governments to act. The conservation movement needs to motivate governments or face an ongoing extinction crisis. Here we explore how linking biodiversity to electoral systems may assist in motivating government action. Using Australia as a case study, we analyze the intersection of 151 electoral districts and 1651 threatened species. We show all districts contain at least 14 threatened species. Half of the species analyzed (n = 801, 49%) are confined to one district (n = 44), with 1345 (81%) species intersecting with less than five. This geographical information shows that alongside local social and economic issues, the threatened species crisis can be made relevant to all Australian elected representatives. Locally relevant information can encourage integration of species needs into the scope of political representation. As such, linking biodiversity to political geography offers a potential pathway to creating transformative change.