Rare or elusive? A test of expert knowledge about rarity of Amazon forest birds

• DOI: 10.1111/ddi.12033
• Publication Date: 2013-01-18T05:16:56Z
• Authors: Marconi C. Cerqueira; Mario Cohn‐Haft; Claudeir F. Vargas; Carlos E. Nader; Christian B. Andr...; Thiago V. V. Costa; Monica Sberze; James E. Hines; Gonçalo Ferraz
• Keywords: 0106 biological sciences; Rainforest; Rarity; Brasil; Amazonas; 15. Life on land; Detection Method; 01 natural sciences; Maximum Likelihood Analysis; Knowledge; Bird; Rare Species; Sampling; Temporal Variation; Aves; Probability

AbstractAimTo offer a test of expert knowledge about rarity of twenty Amazon forest bird species following an approach that equates rarity with low site occupancy and formally accounts for imperfect species detection. We define ten pairs of closely related species, each pair with one hypothetically common and one hypothetically rare species. Our null hypothesis is that members of each pair have similar occupancy, with hypothesized differences due to detection errors alone.LocationA 1000‐ha plot of primary rainforest in the central Brazilian Amazon.MethodsWe visited each of 55 sampling sites multiple times per season for three field seasons and estimated the probability of site occupancy by each species following a maximum likelihood state‐space approach that also estimates the probability that a species is present yet undetected at a site. To maximize detection and account for its variation, we employed three different sampling techniques while systematically training and testing observer's ability to recognize species.ResultsOccupancy estimates agree with expert predictions in all but two species pairs and show no evidence of clear temporal variation in occupancy between sampling seasons. Detection probability had a positive relation with observer ability, a strong relation to time of day across species, and a strong relation with the use of playback for some species. Detection with point counts and with autonomous recorders varied between species pairs.Main conclusionsWe reject the null hypothesis of equal occupancy within pairs, concluding that expert knowledge on species rarity is useful and worth eliciting. Our results replace qualitative ratings of rarity with statistical estimates of occupancy, establishing a reliable baseline for future comparisons. Besides illustrating the relevance of expert knowledge, this application to Amazonian birds illustrates a flexible approach that can be used for testing knowledge about rarity for a variety of species groups and spatial scales.