Lipid‐lowering efficacy and safety of alirocumab in patients with or without diabetes: A sub‐analysis of ODYSSEY COMBO II

• DOI: 10.1111/dom.12909
• Publication Date: 2017-02-16T10:33:06Z
• Authors: Lawrence A. Leiter; José Luis Zamorano; Maja Bujas‐Bobanovic; Michael J. Louie; Guillaume Lecorps; Christopher P. Ca...; Yehuda Handelsman
• Keywords: Male; dyslipidaemia; Serine Proteinase Inhibitors; type 1 diabetes; Injections, Subcutaneous; Hyperlipidemias; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Drug Administration Schedule; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Complications; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Double-Blind Method; cardiovascular disease; Risk Factors; Humans; Healthy Lifestyle; Aged; Hypolipidemic Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal; clinical trial; Original Articles; Cholesterol, LDL; Middle Aged; Combined Modality Therapy; 3. Good health; Cardiovascular Diseases; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; type 2 diabetes; Proprotein Convertase 9; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Follow-Up Studies

AimThis sub‐analysis of the ODYSSEY COMBO II study compared the effects of alirocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor, in high cardiovascular risk patients with or without diabetes mellitus (DM) receiving maximally tolerated statin therapy.MethodsCOMBO II was a 104‐week, double‐blind study (n = 720) enrolling patients with documented atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and baseline LDL‐C ≥70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L), and patients without documented ASCVD at high cardiovascular risk with LDL‐C ≥100 mg/dL (2.6 mmol/L). Patients receiving maximally tolerated statin therapy were randomized (2:1) to alirocumab 75 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W; 1 mL subcutaneous injection) or oral ezetimibe 10 mg daily. Alirocumab dose was increased to 150 mg Q2W (also 1 mL) at Week 12 if Week 8 LDL‐C was ≥70 mg/dL.ResultsHistory of DM was reported in 31% (n = 148) of patients on alirocumab and 32% (n = 77) of patients on ezetimibe. At Week 24, alirocumab consistently reduced LDL‐C from baseline in patients with (−49.1%) or without DM (−51.2%) to a significantly greater extent than ezetimibe (−18.4% and −21.8%, respectively). Occurrence of treatment‐emergent adverse events was similar between groups. Efficacy results at 104 weeks were similar to those at 24 weeks.ConclusionsOver a 104‐week double‐blind study period, alirocumab provided consistently greater LDL‐C reductions than ezetimibe, with similar LDL‐C results in patients with or without DM. Safety of alirocumab was similar regardless of baseline DM status.