Stress distribution in delayed replanted teeth splinted with different orthodontic wires: a three‐dimensional finite element analysis
Dental Stress Analysis
670
Finite Element Analysis
Composite Resins
03 medical and health sciences
Imaging, Three-Dimensional
0302 clinical medicine
Elastic Modulus
Alloys
Maxilla
Orthodontic Wires
Humans
Biomechanics
Computer Simulation
Molybdenum
Titanium
Avulsion
Dental trauma
Finite element analysis
Tooth Injuries
X-Ray Microtomography
Models, Dental
Biomechanical Phenomena
Steel
Tooth Replantation
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
DOI:
10.1111/edt.12159
Publication Date:
2015-01-21T10:32:08Z
AUTHORS (7)
ABSTRACT
AbstractAimThe aim was to evaluate the biomechanical behavior of the supporting bony structures of replanted teeth and the periodontal ligament (PDL) of adjacent teeth when orthodontic wires with different mechanical properties are applied, with three‐dimensional finite element analysis.Materials and methodsBased on tomographic and microtomographic data, a three‐dimensional model of the anterior maxilla with the corresponding teeth (tooth 13–tooth 23) was generated to simulate avulsion and replantation of the tooth 21. The teeth were splinted with orthodontic wire (Ø 0.8 mm) and composite resin. The elastic modulus of the three orthodontic wires used, that is, steel wire (FA), titanium–molybdenum wire (FTM), and nitinol wire (FN) were 200 GPa, 84 GPa, and 52 GPa, respectively. An oblique load (100 N) was applied at an angle of 45° on the incisal edge of the replanted tooth and was analyzed using Ansys Workbench software. The maximum (σmax) and minimum (σmin) principal stresses generated in the PDL, cortical and alveolar bones, and the modified von Mises (σvM) values for the orthodontic wires were obtained.ResultsWith regard to the cortical bone and PDL, the highest σmin and σmax values for FTM, FN, and FA were checked. With regard to the alveolar bone, σmax and σmin values were highest for FA, followed by FTM and FN. The σvM values of the orthodontic wires followed the order of rigidity of the alloys, that is, FA > FTM > FN.ConclusionThe biomechanical behavior of the analyzed structures with regard to all the three patterns of flexibility was similar.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (30)
CITATIONS (10)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....