On the mismatch in the strength of competition among fossil and modern species of planktonic Foraminifera
580
zooplankton
0301 basic medicine
570
macroevolution
0303 health sciences
interspecific competition
590
diversity dependent diversification
15. Life on land
03 medical and health sciences
13. Climate action
time-series analysis
microfossils
14. Life underwater
diversity dependent diversification
community ecology
community phylogenetics
DOI:
10.1111/geb.13000
Publication Date:
2019-09-13T06:05:46Z
AUTHORS (7)
ABSTRACT
Abstract Aim Many clades display the macroevolutionary pattern of a negative relationship between standing diversity and diversification rates. Competition among species has been proposed as main mechanism that explains this pattern. However, we currently lack empirical insight into how effects individual‐level ecological interactions scale up to affect diversification. Here, investigate clade shows evidence for diversity‐dependent in fossil record test whether clade's modern communities show corresponding signal interspecific competition. Location World's oceans. Time period Holocene. Major taxa studied Planktonic Foraminifera (Rhizaria). Methods We explore spatial temporal patterns expected under Firstly, use community phylogenetics approach signs local competitive exclusion ecologically similar (defined closely related or shell sizes) by combining relative abundances seafloor sediments. Secondly, analyse population co‐occurring covary negatively through time using sediment trap time‐series spanning 1–12 years. Results The great majority assemblages are indistinguishable from randomly assembled communities, showing no significant co‐occurrence regarding phylogeny size similarity. Through time, most pairs correlated positively, indicating synchronous rather than compensatory dynamics. Main conclusions found detectable competition structuring extant planktonic communities. Species co‐occurrences dynamics likely regulated abiotic environment and/or distantly species, intra‐clade density‐dependent processes. This interpretation contradicts idea drives One way better integrate ecology macroevolution is consider influenced groups interact even when related.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (90)
CITATIONS (17)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....