Early impact of the COVID‐19 pandemic on outpatient migraine care in Hawaii: Results of a quality improvement survey

• DOI: 10.1111/head.14030
• Publication Date: 2020-12-15T05:41:36Z
• Authors: Maiya Smith; Max Nakamoto; Julie Crocker; Frances Tiffany M...; Keke Liu; Enze Ma; Ariel Chong; Nicholas Van; Vimala Vajjala; Enrique Carrazana; Jason Viereck; Kore Liow
• Keywords: Adult; Male; Adolescent; SARS-CoV-2; Migraine Disorders; Clinical Neurology; COVID-19; Middle Aged; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Quality Improvement; Hawaii; Health Services Accessibility; Telemedicine; 3. Good health; Young Adult; 03 medical and health sciences; 0302 clinical medicine; Neurology; Surveys and Questionnaires; Ambulatory Care; Humans; Female; Child; Aged

AbstractObjectiveA survey was implemented for early assessment of pandemic‐related practice processes and quality improvement (QI).BackgroundIn response to the public health measures in Hawaii to curtail the coronavirus 2019 pandemic, Hawaii Pacific Neuroscience (HPN) adapted their patient care to ensure continuity of neurological treatment.MethodsThe telephone survey was conducted on patients seen at HPN during the period of April 22, 2020–May 18, 2020 to address four areas related to patients’ outpatient experience: delivery of care, general well‐being, experience with telemedicine, and disease‐specific questions.ResultsA total of 928 patients were contacted of which 429 (46.2%) patients responded and 367 (85.5%) agreed to participate. A total of 133 patients with migraine and 234 patients with other neurological conditions provided responses. Our migraine patients’ survey responses suggest that their well‐being was disproportionately negatively affected by the pandemic. Survey respondents with migraine were significantly more likely than their non‐migraine peers to report worsening anxiety and sleep problems [62/132 (47.0%) vs. 78/234 (33.3%), χ2 = 6.64, p = 0.010, and 64/132 (48.5%) vs. 73/234 (31.2%), χ2 = 10.77, p = 0.001]; migraine patients also reported worsening of depression as a result of the pandemic more than patients with other diagnoses, though this was not statistically significant [44/132 (33.3%) vs. 57/234 (24.4%), χ2 = 3.40, p = 0.065]. In regard to access to healthcare, significantly more migraine patients reported running out of medications than those with other diagnoses [20/133 (15.0%) vs. 18/234 (7.7%), χ2 = 4.93, p = 0.026]. More avoided seeking medical help for new health problems because of the pandemic [30/133 (22.6%) vs. 30/234 (12.8%), χ2 = 5.88, p = 0.015]. Migraine patients were also significantly impacted economically by the pandemic; 43/132 (32.4%) of migraine patients reported losing their jobs as the result of the pandemic versus 34/234 (14.5%) of their peers (χ2 = 11.20, p < 0.001). An increase in headache severity or frequency was reported in 39/118 (33.1%) of respondents and 19/118 (16.1%) reported to using more abortive therapy than usual. Telemedicine was well received by almost all patients who took advantage of the option. Most of those patients found telemedicine to be easy to use and as valuable as an in‐person visit. Migraine patients indicated with more frequency that without the telemedicine option, they would have missed their medical appointments [37/68 (54.4%) vs. 56/144 (38.6%), χ2 = 4.31, p = 0.038]; a majority would prefer or consider telemedicine for future appointments over in‐person visits.ConclusionsInsights gained from this QI survey to the practice's new pandemic‐related processes include stressing lifestyle modification, optimizing treatment plans, and continuing the option of telemedicine.