Validation of the bag‐mediated filtration system for environmental surveillance of poliovirus in Nairobi, Kenya
0301 basic medicine
Sewage
Enteric viruses
ViroCap
Original Articles
Wastewater
Serogroup
Bag-mediated filtration system (BMFS)
Kenya
3. Good health
Poliovirus
03 medical and health sciences
Standard WHO two‐phase separation methods
Poliovirus Vaccine, Oral
Humans
Environmental surveillance
Filtration
Environmental Monitoring
Poliomyelitis
DOI:
10.1111/jam.14807
Publication Date:
2020-08-03T01:00:20Z
AUTHORS (25)
ABSTRACT
This study compared the bag-mediated filtration system (BMFS) and standard WHO two-phase separation methods for poliovirus (PV) environmental surveillance, examined factors impacting PV detection and monitored Sabin-like (SL) PV type 2 presence with withdrawal of oral polio vaccine type 2 (OPV2) in April 2016.Environmental samples were collected in Nairobi, Kenya (Sept 2015-Feb 2017), concentrated via BMFS and two-phase separation methods, then assayed using the WHO PV isolation algorithm and intratypic differentiation diagnostic screening kit. SL1, SL2 and SL3 were detected at higher rates in BMFS than two-phase samples (P < 0·05). In BMFS samples, SL PV detection did not significantly differ with volume filtered, filtration time or filter shipment time (P > 0·05), while SL3 was detected less frequently with higher shipment temperatures (P = 0·027). SL2 was detected more frequently before OPV2 withdrawal in BMFS and two-phase samples (P < 1 × 10-5 ).Poliovirus was detected at higher rates with the BMFS, a method that includes a secondary concentration step, than using the standard WHO two-phase method. SL2 disappearance from the environment was commensurate with OPV2 withdrawal.The BMFS offers comparable or improved PV detection under the conditions in this study, relative to the two-phase method.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (36)
CITATIONS (3)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....