Cardiovascular risk assessment tools in Asia
Promotion and Disease Reduction in Cardiovascular Health
Epidemiology
Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Framingham Risk Score
FOS: Mechanical engineering
Review
R Medicine (General)
Stroke* / epidemiology
Engineering
0302 clinical medicine
cardiovascular disease
Risk Factors
Computer security
Disease
Longitudinal Studies
hypertension-general
Cardiovascular Events
Internal medicine
Risk assessment
Geography
Incidence (geometry)
Physics
risk assessment
hypertension—general
Mechanical engineering
3. Good health
Stroke
Coronary heart disease
Stroke* / prevention & control
Environmental health
Archaeology
Cardiovascular Diseases
Hypertension
RC Internal medicine
Medicine
Stroke (engine)
Metabolic Syndrome and Cardiovascular Disease
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Cardiovascular Diseases* / prevention & control
China
Asia
610
Risk Assessment
03 medical and health sciences
Stroke* / etiology
Health Sciences
Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system
Humans
Asia / epidemiology
Management of Hypertension and Cardiovascular Risk Factors
Optics
Hypertension* / epidemiology
Computer science
Hypertension* / complications
Heart Disease Risk Factors
Hypertension* / diagnosis
RC666-701
Risk factor
Asian patients
DOI:
10.1111/jch.14336
Publication Date:
2022-01-04T09:38:18Z
AUTHORS (26)
ABSTRACT
AbstractCardiovascular disease (CVD) is becoming the most important burden to health care systems in most part of the world, especially in Asia. Aiming at identifying high risk individuals and tailoring preventive treatment, many cardiovascular risk assessment tools have been established and most of them were developed in Western countries. However, these cardiovascular risk assessment tools cannot be used interchangeably without recalibration because of the different risk factor profiles (ie, greater absolute burden of hypertension and lower level of total‐cholesterol in Asians and higher prevalence of metabolic disorders in South Asians) and different CVD profiles (higher ratio of stroke/coronary heart disease in Asians) between Western and Asian populations. Original risk models such as Prediction for ASCVD Risk in China (China‐PAR) and Japan Arteriosclerosis Longitudinal Study (JALS) score have been developed and well validated for specific countries, while most of countries/regions in Asia are using established models. Due to higher incidence of stroke in Asians, risk factors like hypertension should weigh more in cardiovascular risk assessment comparing with Western populations, but their actual proportions should be based on CVD profiles in specific countries/regions. The authors encourage the development of new cardiovascular risk assessment tools for Asians, if possible. Still, modifying established models with native epidemiological data of risk factor as well as CVD is acceptable in regions where health care resources are insufficient.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (34)
CITATIONS (37)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....