Cardiovascular risk assessment tools in Asia

Promotion and Disease Reduction in Cardiovascular Health Epidemiology Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism Framingham Risk Score FOS: Mechanical engineering Review R Medicine (General) Stroke* / epidemiology Engineering 0302 clinical medicine cardiovascular disease Risk Factors Computer security Disease Longitudinal Studies hypertension-general Cardiovascular Events Internal medicine Risk assessment Geography Incidence (geometry) Physics risk assessment hypertension—general Mechanical engineering 3. Good health Stroke Coronary heart disease Stroke* / prevention & control Environmental health Archaeology Cardiovascular Diseases Hypertension RC Internal medicine Medicine Stroke (engine) Metabolic Syndrome and Cardiovascular Disease Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine Cardiovascular Diseases* / prevention & control China Asia 610 Risk Assessment 03 medical and health sciences Stroke* / etiology Health Sciences Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system Humans Asia / epidemiology Management of Hypertension and Cardiovascular Risk Factors Optics Hypertension* / epidemiology Computer science Hypertension* / complications Heart Disease Risk Factors Hypertension* / diagnosis RC666-701 Risk factor Asian patients
DOI: 10.1111/jch.14336 Publication Date: 2022-01-04T09:38:18Z
ABSTRACT
AbstractCardiovascular disease (CVD) is becoming the most important burden to health care systems in most part of the world, especially in Asia. Aiming at identifying high risk individuals and tailoring preventive treatment, many cardiovascular risk assessment tools have been established and most of them were developed in Western countries. However, these cardiovascular risk assessment tools cannot be used interchangeably without recalibration because of the different risk factor profiles (ie, greater absolute burden of hypertension and lower level of total‐cholesterol in Asians and higher prevalence of metabolic disorders in South Asians) and different CVD profiles (higher ratio of stroke/coronary heart disease in Asians) between Western and Asian populations. Original risk models such as Prediction for ASCVD Risk in China (China‐PAR) and Japan Arteriosclerosis Longitudinal Study (JALS) score have been developed and well validated for specific countries, while most of countries/regions in Asia are using established models. Due to higher incidence of stroke in Asians, risk factors like hypertension should weigh more in cardiovascular risk assessment comparing with Western populations, but their actual proportions should be based on CVD profiles in specific countries/regions. The authors encourage the development of new cardiovascular risk assessment tools for Asians, if possible. Still, modifying established models with native epidemiological data of risk factor as well as CVD is acceptable in regions where health care resources are insufficient.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (34)
CITATIONS (37)
EXTERNAL LINKS
PlumX Metrics
RECOMMENDATIONS
FAIR ASSESSMENT
Coming soon ....
JUPYTER LAB
Coming soon ....