Effects of a 12‐month home‐based exercise program on functioning after hip fracture – Secondary analyses of an RCT

Male home-based exercise fyysinen toimintakyky Clinical Investigations leikkaushoito functioning 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine REHABILITATION PROGRAM STRENGTH Activities of Daily Living Hyvinvoinnin tutkimuksen yhteisö Humans OLDER-ADULTS PREDICTORS Physiotherapy luunmurtumat lääkinnällinen kuntoutus Physical Therapy Modalities School of Wellbeing Aged, 80 and over OUTCOMES Gerontologia ja kansanterveys Hand Strength Hip Fractures MORTALITY Gerontologian tutkimuskeskus ta3141 ta3142 physical performance RECOVERY lonkka General medicine, internal medicine and other clinical medicine Exercise Therapy 3. Good health PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY MOBILITY hip fracture INSTRUMENTAL ACTIVITIES Female Fysioterapia Gerontology Research Center Gerontology and Public Health ikääntyneet liikuntahoito
DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17824 Publication Date: 2022-05-18T09:13:56Z
ABSTRACT
AbstractBackgroundLong‐term functional limitations are common after hip fractures. Exercise may alleviate these negative consequences but there is no consensus on an optimal training program. The objective was to study the effects of a 12‐month home‐based supervised, progressive exercise program on functioning, physical performance, and physical activity.MethodsSecondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial targeting patients with surgical repair of a hip fracture, aged ≥60 years, Mini‐Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of ≥12. The participants were randomized into Exercise (n = 61) or Usual care (n = 60). Assessments at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months included Lawton's Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB), handgrip strength, and self‐reported frequency of sessions of leisure‐time physical activity. Analyzed using mixed‐effects models.ResultsParticipants' (n = 121) mean age was 81 years (SD 7), and 75% were women. The mean IADL score at baseline was 17.1 (SD 4.5) in the exercise group, and 17.4 (5.1) in the usual care group. The mean SPPB scores were 3.9 (1.6) and 4.2 (1.8), and handgrip strength was 17.7 (8.9) kg and 20.8 (8.0) kg, respectively. The age‐ and sex‐adjusted mean changes in IADL over 12 months were 3.7 (95% CI 2.8–4.7) in the exercise and 2.0 (1.0–3.0) in the usual care group (between‐group difference, p = 0.016); changes in SPPB 4.3 (3.6–4.9) and 2.1 (1.5–2.7) (p < 0.001); and changes in handgrip strength 1.2 kg (0.3–2.0) and 1.0 kg (−1.9 to −0.2) (p < 0.001), respectively. We found no between‐group differences in changes in the frequency of leisure‐time activity sessions.ConclusionA 12‐month home‐based supervised, progressive exercise program improved functioning and physical performance more than usual care among patients with hip fractures. However, the training did not increase leisure‐time physical activity.
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL
Coming soon ....
REFERENCES (49)
CITATIONS (8)